Florida Venture Blog by Dan Rua dan

No-BS Venture Thoughts for No-BS Entrepreneurs.

A running perspective on Florida's growing tech and venture community, with an occasional detour to the Southeast/national scene, venture capital FAQs and maybe a gadget or two....

By Dan Rua, Managing Partner of Inflexion Partners -- "Florida's Venture Fund".

GuessNow: Can Predictive Markets Be Fun?

I've always been intrigued by the potential of predictive markets: speculative markets created for the purpose of making predictions. That's why I was excited when Delray Beach, FL-based GuessNow contacted me about sponsoring an FVB review via PPP Direct. It was also timely because I'm following up my completion of Chris Anderson's The Long Tail, with James Surowiecki's The Wisdom of Crowds.

The broad idea behind predictive markets is that large populations of people, who stand to benefit from accurate predictions, can become an engine for predicting future events. If you read the wikipedia article I linked above, you'll find that there is some controversy around the accuracy of results and various approaches to received optimal results.

GuessNow.com has an interesting management team, with John Ferber leading the charge as CEO. John, with his brother Scott, previously founded Advertising.com before selling it to AOL in 2004. I like serial entrepreneurs. I like the connection of advertising minds to predictive markets, because I've seen too many companies pursue "cool ideas" like artificial intelligence, behavioral modelling or predictive markets with business models as a secondary concern. I also like that the site feels a bit more engaging/fun than you might expect from a predictive market.

Turning to the site itself, I thought John's incentive system was interesting. Instead of a pure stock market type of system with various prices for different outcomes, GN implemented a point system. Specifically, users can earn points for answering questions correctly (more points for correct, fewer points for incorrect), answering questions early (more points for early, fewer points for later), and avoiding group think (more points for correct answers going against the crowd). They also have a bonus point system for site participation and advertiser offers, but I don't entirely understand the "bonus" section of the site -- that section feels more like rewarding site behavior and CPA advertising than predictive.

Points are then redeemed for cash, according to a "point value" decided by the total Prize Pool for a month divided by the total number of points awarded in that month. For example, if 500,000 points are awarded in a month with a $5,000 Prize Pool, then each point is worth $.01. If you earned 1,000 points that month, then your points are worth $10.00. I believe a similar calculation happens for the Bonus Prize Pool and bonus points.

They have a good set of questions, including topic areas such as:
Some of the questions I've answered include:
The model is pretty flexible. In addition to predictive questions, I also noticed trivia-type questions (e.g. "name the state that...") and survey-type questions (see hybrid car question above). It's not clear these are necessary to keep people engaged for predictions, but I can see them opening monetization options.

A few of my suggestions include:
1) I loved some of the higher level data concepts such as accuracy ratios, friction and confidence levels -- find ways to share that data and reward publicly on these;
2) I know the "Shocking New Video" ads are probably prompted/related to your Miss Internet Pageant 2007, but they could be a tad risque for the diverse demographic good predictions will require; and
3) I may have missed it, but I couldn't find where to compare past group predictions with past actual results -- that is the question everyone has about such markets and there has to be some data you can share, probably great linkbait.

And, lastly, I'd be remiss if I didn't mention GN's points-based affiliate program and blog. I don't know GN's funding status, but this review has prompted me to dig a little deeper. Thanks for reaching out to me guys!

(sponsored post)

Labels: , , , , , , ,

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Comments (6)

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow what a really cool site, i'm hooked! thanks for the turn on!

8:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is site is so much fun as everyone should try it. I play all the time and love it.

One of the best things is that the more I answered right, the more points I got and that in turn helped me to win the big prize pool for last month.

Maybe guessnow.com will be on tv?

Thanks again

9:25 AM  
Blogger VC Dan said...

Thanks for the comments, but I'm not a big fan of anonymous comments. I'm glad you liked the tip, but please introduce yourself with at least a proper siglink next time... ;-)

10:03 AM  
Blogger Cotter said...

i dunno - seems to me that people whose answer you should value may not want to invest their time on something that must pay out minimal $ at best...

Of course, Yahoo Answers has rockin participation, and pays nothing, so there - but then it becomes a scale game, which these guys cant play (yet).

4:01 PM  
Blogger VC Dan said...

@gc: The system shouldn't rely on a few extremely insightful people in each category so I agree they need to get scale.

I also think that cash payout models work good for attracting a segment of the population, but it may now provide the diversity required for broad-based predictions. That's why I'd recommend publishing as much data/intelligence as possible from these votes.

There are plenty of data junkies whether for fun or business that would participate in exchange for interesting predictive analytics. Done right, I also think there is as much money to be made in selling those analytics as there is in ads.

Yes, I know, catch-22 to either publish it early to drive traffic or hide it to monetize B2B...there could be a way to monetize insight as votes are taking place and just after close; then publish a week or so later.

5:43 PM  
Blogger VC Dan said...

correction above: I meant to say "may NOT provide the diversity required"

5:44 PM  

Post a Comment


<< Home