Google's PageRank Patent in Jeopardy?
John shares some cases/quotes of note including:
In re Bilski: "[USPTO] takes the position that process inventions generally are unpatentable unless they 'result in a physical transformation of an article' or are 'tied to a particular machine'."
Ex parte Langemyr: “Any and all computing systems will suffice, indicating that the claim is not directed to the function of any particular machine. … Thus, the claimed method is not tied to ‘a particular machine,’ but rather is tied only to a general purpose computer.”
Ex parte Wasynczuk: “the sole structural limitation recited is the ‘computer-implemented system’ of the preamble” and that limitation “is not any particular apparatus” because the computer could be “essentially any conventional apparatus that performs the claimed functions.”
If you're in the software business, this is a topic worth watching...
Labels: bilski, google, john duffy, langemyr, pagerank, patentlyo, patents, software patents, wasynczuk
Comments (2)
It is important to note that Stanford University, not Google, owns the page rank patent. Google just bought a license to use it.
great point smoe...I wonder who has the right/responsibility to defend the patent if challenged -- my guess: Google.
Post a Comment
<< Home