Florida Venture Blog by Dan Rua dan

No-BS Venture Thoughts for No-BS Entrepreneurs.

A running perspective on Florida's growing tech and venture community, with an occasional detour to the Southeast/national scene, venture capital FAQs and maybe a gadget or two....

By Dan Rua, Managing Partner of Inflexion Partners -- "Florida's Venture Fund".

Twitter Icons for Halloween or Helloween?

Whoa...I just noticed some slick Halloween icons float thru my twitter feed and chased down these tweets from J. Adam Moore:
"Whoa, I just shat a bunch of halloween icons all over my twitter page.
I feel like

Twitter helloween icons

twitter icon - bat>o<
twitter icon - frankenstein[:-]-I-
twitter icon - witch<|:~(
twitter icon - mummy(|:|/)
twitter icon - skull8-#
twitter icon - gravestone+-(
twitter icon - pumpkin`O
twitter icon - moon( | )
twitter icon - cat∑:*)
twitter icon - werewolf}:o{
twitter icon - vampire:-[
twitter icon - zombieX-/
twitter icon - spider////Ö\\\\
twitter icon - ghost[TBD]

Slick! I want more twitter icons...

UPDATE:
It appears Hajime KOBAYASHI is involved somehow, as the Halloween twitter image table is hosted on his site. Get 'em while they're hot, as they may not be around long.

UPDATE 10-31-08: I've found some additional icons, like
twitter icon - ghost, although I don't know the keystrokes. Comment here if you figure them out...

Labels: , , , ,

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Free Money for Life Science Entrepreneurs

medtechthursday
Guest Post by:
Mike Schmitt, MD
Life Science Analyst and Editor of the Florida BioDatabase
Mike can be reached at M2Schmitt@aol.com

sebio
“Free Money” for life science entrepreneurs with up to $100,000 in cash and services!

Now that I have your full attention (I had to get a “hook” in there somewhere—the money may not be totally “free”, but it’s a great deal as start ups go), I’d like to tell you about the SEBIO sponsored annual “Bio/Plan Competition.”

Last post I mentioned the upcoming Southeast BIO (SEBIO) Conference to be held on December 4-5, 2008 in Palm Beach. For those not familiar with this organization, SEBIO is a non-profit public/private partnership to promote the development of the life sciences throughout the Southeast.

One of the exciting events at this conference is the announcement of the winner of the annual Bio/Plan Competition.

This is intended to identify and support newly created venture-fundable entities in the life sciences (the majority of the applicants are from research universities and research labs throughout the Southeast).

Here is how it works...(from the SEBIO website):

  1. The principal investigator/entrepreneur completes a short application outlining their concept and the associated opportunity in broad terms. There is no application fee.
  2. A selection committee chooses 10 semifinalists and pairs each with a team of seasoned professionals who will serve as mentors to the principals. The group's goal will be to further develop the concept and surround it with a first-class business plan.
  3. Following a period of 5 to 6 months with the assigned mentoring team, a finished business plan will be submitted by the principals to a panel of experts and 4 finalists will be selected. These finalists will present their opportunity to the broader life science investment community at the annual SEBIO Investor Forum held each fall.
  4. The winner of the BIO/Plan Competition will be selected at this Conference and will be awarded unrestricted, non-dilutive venture funds (valued at $100,000 in cash and services) to launch the enterprise and implement their business plan.

In the past, the application process began in February. It’s not too early to start thinking ahead. Readers can check out further details at the SEBIO website (www.sebio.org/bioplan).

Labels: , , , ,

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Google TAC Deception and Marketplace Margins

wildcardwednesday
Google's better-than-expected 3rd Quarter earnings last week was welcome news to a nervous market and a valley on the verge of panic. There was a lot of juicy data to dig into, but one Q&A that caught my eye was:
Q: A little more clarification to improvement in margins. Was that through better AdSense deals, or through expense controls?
A: Across all categories of expenses people have been very diligent.....I am not aware of a change on the ad partnership side that would result in a margin change.
This caught my eye because I've been researching marketplace margins for some time, including GOOG. While there may not have been a noteworthy AdSense partner margin change this quarter, the longer-term trend is eye-opening. In fact, if my calculations are right, Gross Margin for GOOG Network Revenues has dropped around 20-25% since Q3 2006. Given how slim those margins already are, that's a shift worth watching. You wouldn't see that if you focused on the deceptive Traffic Acquisition Cost (TAC: roughly the inverse of GOOG Network margins) chart GOOG shares each quarter:

That chart looks like TAC is dropping and, thus, margins are rising. However, TAC is largely driven by GOOG Network partner payouts -- but the chart compares to all GOOG revenues, not just those from GOOG Network partners?!?

Given that my research has been focused on Google's Network, rather than their proprietary properties, I charted GOOG's Gross Network Revenue, Net Network Revenue and Gross Network Margin below. I didn't include proprietary revenues and I only included TAC from AdSense Partner payouts -- providing a better apples-to-apples comparison of revenues and margins.

The result, contrary to GOOG's official TAC slide, this chart shows GOOG Network gross margins dropping over time -- from 25% in Q3 2006 down to 20% in Q3 2008. Gross margins of 25% are already considered low in technology circles, shave off another 5% and I start wondering if something important is happening in GOOG's Network (e.g. competition for publishers).

It also makes me question what the market is telling us about appropriate margins for online marketplaces -- should they be 50%+, like many other technology businesses. Once you take GOOG proprietary properties out of the mix, AdSense is essentially a marketplace between advertisers and publishers -- with GOOG providing an opaque venue. Publishers are getting 80% of each click and GOOG is getting 20% of each click. With over a billion a quarter flowing through the marketplace, that's a strong datapoint for marketplace margins.

Are there other marketplaces that could provide a sanity check to GOOG's numbers? The largest is probably eBay, although EBAY provides much more marketplace transparency for its participants. More transparency might suggest lower margins, because it's harder for EBAY to hide their cut the way GOOG does. The following chart confirms that suspicion -- EBAY's Gross Marketplace Margin has grown by almost 50% (unlike GOOG's dropping Network Margin), but overall magnitude is smaller at 9.3%.
Therefore sellers are getting 91% of each sale and EBAY is getting 9%. With over $60 billion of Gross Merchandise Sales projected for 2008, that's another strong datapoint for marketplace margins. Note, although EBAY may use other terms for gross or net revenue, using Gross Merchandise Sales provides the best apples-to-apples comparison to Gross Network Revenues in an advertising marketplace like Google -- one marketplace sells physical goods, the other sells advertising.

That gives us two substantial datapoints for online marketplace gross margins: 6-9% and 20-25%. Do you know others? Is my math wrong (probably)? Should they both jump their margins to the 50%+ expected of technology companies? All thoughts appreciated...

Labels: , , , ,

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Cool Graphics Chips, Thanks to Celsia NanoSpreaders

infotechtuesday
vapor chamber
"Celsia Tehnologies is developing new coolers that will send conventional heat-pipe technology into oblivion"
I like the sound of that, and it's not even my words. They're from Theo Valich, who reviewed the recent partnership announced between AMD and Inflexion portfolio company Celsia. The announcement was also covered by Anton Shilov at X-bit labs. Celsia CEO, Joe Formichelli, had this to say about the AMD efforts:
"Working with AMD, we were able to meet all of the design criteria for a new GPU cooler. Namely, it had to be lighter, perform better and be lower cost than the current heat pipe based design. Unlike thermal modules using heat pipes, our two-phase NanoSpreader comes in direct contact with the heat source whereby removing costly, heavy base plates."
Setting aside all the technology details, Celsia's vapor chamber innovations mean higher performing graphics processors, which means better graphics, virtual worlds and gaming. Although Moore's law suggests we'll continue packing more processing power into chips, keeping that power from burning up your chips, graphics cards and laps will require comparable advances in cooling. Cooler chips = kewler games...

Labels: , , , , , ,

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Performance Marketing for Blogs, IZEA Innovates Again

newmediamonday
When I first invested into IZEA, I liked the parallel between Google's sponsored search (pioneered by GoTo/Overture) and IZEA's sponsored content. Google's sponsored search pays for all the other cool free stuff they offer, and is the foundation for much of the internet ecosystem -- it's arguably the most successful online business model to date. Sponsored content holds similar promise.

However, there was always a missing piece in my comparison -- sponsored search was offered on a performance-based model and sponsored content was offered on a pay-per-post model. Although pay-per-post is a natural for the blogosphere, with many blog jobs paying on that model, it's most appropriate for a subset of marketing goals -- brand and media/buzz.

Performance-based marketing, however, is more appropriate for direct marketers -- the bread and butter of Google's sponsored search behemoth. I also happen to believe performance marketing will continue to take a larger and larger share of the marketing buy -- particularly as the broader markets tighten and marketers want more bang for their buck. All of this presents the opportunity for IZEA to revolutionize yet another industry through blogs -- performance marketing.

IZEA just announced SocialSpark Affiliate Opportunities -- sponsored posts that are compensated on a cost-per-action basis. This allows bloggers to capture an ongoing share of the marketing value they create -- not just a flat fee per post. It also allows marketers to pay for performance -- compensating for actions (CPA) like signups, sales, forms, leads etc. The result, as the system scales, should be higher ROI for everyone.

Some of you may ask "Great, Dan, but how do readers benefit from IZEA's approach to performance marketing?" For that I'd share a dirty little secret about blogosphere affiliate marketing -- despite all the uproar about disclosure on pay-per-post sponsored content, multi-billion dollar affiliate networks have ignored reader disclosure to date. IZEA, as the leader on social media marketing transparency, a governing member of WOMMA and creator of DisclosurePolicy.org, has introduced the industry's first 100% Disclosure affiliate network. Every SocialSpark Affiliate post must conform to SocialSpark's Code of Ethics, including auditable in-post disclosure. The largest affiliate networks don't even mention "disclosure" in their Terms of Service -- IZEA leads.

And for the Google lovers out there, SocialSpark's Code of Ethics also requires 100% no-follow affiliate links, to guarantee adherence to Google Quality Guidelines -- another first for the affiliate industry. SocialSpark bloggers makeup the only GOOG-approved sponsored blogging network on the planet.

All of this is delivered within SocialSpark's existing blogger/advertiser marketplace, including advanced segmentation and analytics. Marketers are able to hand-pick bloggers or develop smart blogrolls that auto-populate based upon segmentation criteria such as traffic, quality, demographics.

Too good to be true? Check out affiliate posts for yourself and tell me what you think.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

SEBIO Update: Florida Catches North Carolina

medtechthursday
Guest Post by:
Mike Schmitt, MD
Life Science Analyst and Editor of the Florida BioDatabase
Mike can be reached at M2Schmitt@aol.com      

Florida is ready to make a good impression at the upcoming Southeast BIO (SEBIO) Conference to be held on December 4-5, 2008 in Palm Beach.  SEBIO is a non-profit public/private partnership to promote the development of the life sciences throughout the Southeast.

Our State has tied North Carolina (this has not happened in recent years that I’m  aware of) with each State having 8 companies selected for the conference (actually, Florida shares an additional company in that NC based Pique Therapeutics has R&D activities in Miami).  Overall, SEBIO has selected 29 companies to participate in this year’s forum.

The conference offers an “early stage” event focused on newly emerging companies along with a “presenting” companies event for those ventures that have completed at least one round of institutional funding.  Public companies are not included in the forum.

This can be an excellent learning opportunity as early stage participants receive direct feed back from venture capitalists and business advisors as they go through the conference process.  Ultimately, 4 of the best are selected for an “Early-Stage Shootout” where they will have a chance to do a full presentation to all of the investors attending the forum.

Selected Presenting Companies of interest to Florida are:

 Selected Early-Stage Florida Companies are:

Since 2005, there have been 15 Florida life science companies that have presented at SEBIO with over $117M raised among this group alone during the past 3 years (this does not include the 2008 participants).  This is an excellent opportunity to gain visibility as well as making a possible connection for VC funding (VC firms from throughout the US have attended including the Southeast, Midwest, West Coast as well as the Northeast regions).

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Jim Kukral Cracks Me Up

I've followed Jim Kukral since well before he called one of my entrepreneurs a f*cking marketing genius, and really enjoy his unique blend of social media advice and humor. As I was reading his "Do Not Give Up" post for entrepreneurs, I noticed this subscribe banner on the bottom.



The man is funny...

Labels: ,

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Make Sure You 'Get' This Memo

wildcard wednesday
A couple memos are making the rounds today that are worth sharing. Uber-angel Ron Conway and Sequoia both delivered portfolio-wide guidance to raise money sooner (if possible), cut expenses ASAP and survive (forget about thrive). The only no-BS color I'll provide is that during the tech bubble, West coast firms felt this pain about 3-4 months earlier than East coast firms. As a result, the East coast companies that internalized the message early were in the best position of all -- getting lean while still having a window of funding options.

Don't let this be one of those "Didn't you get the memo?" moments for you and your board/investors:

Conway Memo: (via TechCrunch)
——— Forwarded message ———-

From: Ron Conway
Date: Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:12 PM
Subject: IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ASAP …..REGARDING CURRENT MARKET CONDITIONS…Confidential

We have all been absorbed by the turmoil in the financial markets the past few weeks

Unlike the turmoil of 2000 when the “action” was centered right here in Silicon Valley this time is it centered on Wall Street…..but it has rippled to the west coast quickly and we will not be “immune” to its drastic effects.

I was an active investor in 2000 when the “bubble burst” and remember it vividly and want to give you the SAME EXACT advice I gave to my portfolio company CEOs back then.

I have pasted in the emails I sent on April 17th 2000 and May 10th 2000 and every word applies today.

Unfortunately history DOES repeat itself but I hope we can learn from history and prevent the turmoil from occurring again.

The message is simple. Raising capital will be much more difficult now.

You should lower your “burn rate” to raise at least 3-6 months or more of funding via cost reductions, even if it means staff reductions and reduced marketing and G&A expenses. This is the equivalent to “raising an internal round” through cost reductions to buy you more time until you need to raise money again; hopefully when fund raising is more feasible. Letting go of staff is hard and often gut wrenching. A re-evaluation of timelines and re-focus on milestones with the eye of doing more with less will allow you to live many more days, and the name of the game in this environment in some
respects is survival–survival until conditions change.

If you are in a funding cycle, you should raise your funding as soon as possible and raise as much as possible but face the fact that if you can’t raise money now you must cut costs.

While I do not own a large percentage of your company I hope you will consider this thoughtful advice.

I was here in 2000 and want to share what I learned through many years of experience and historical “pattern recognition”!

Here are the two emails from the year 2000 that I referred to above and all the statements apply in today’s market:

To: Angel Investors, L.P. Portfolio CEOs
Date: 04/17/2000 05:24 PM
From: Ron Conway
RE: Market Conditions Effect on Angel Investors, L.P. Portfolio
Companies

The down draft in the stock market sends us some obvious “signals” and we can’t help but mention them.

1. If you are in a funding cycle, you should raise your funding as soon as possible and raise as much as possible.

2. Many companies are ignoring certain VC leads we’ve provided in order to concentrate on the top tier only. While we have preached that in the past, this is no longer the case. Currently, top-tier VC
bandwidth constraints, coupled with the market down draft, make it very important to take meetings with any VCs where you can get their attention. We have been working hard to open up this new bandwidth.

3. You must aggressively examine and pursue M&A opportunities (unless you have over 12 months of cash reserves!) ro insure you have critical mass (including funding, customers, rolodex power, market
share, cash, synergy, etc.).

4. Be realistic on valuations - they will fall so be ready and willing to co-operate.

5. Look for corporate partners to invest so you can raise more money. You should also consider a sale of your company to your corporate partners.

6. If you are entering a funding cycle start raising money sooner rather than later.

7. While it’s safe to say entrepreneurs have had negotiating leverage with the “down draft” in the market, the VC community will start exercising their leverage.
—————————————————————————-
—————————————-

To: Angel Investors, L.P. Portfolio CEOs
Date: 05/10/2000 05:23 PM
From: Ron Conway
RE: Market Conditions Effect on Angel Investors, L.P. Portfolio
Companies

I want to “touch base” again; given the continued uncertainty in the capital markets.

As the market turmoil continues, we must underscore the advice that we have provided since mid April and it boils down to just a few points:

1) The capital market window is shut, including IPOs and VC Funding (VCs are looking at their existing portfolio funding needs - not new opportunities). Basically the market is now looking for PtoP (Path to Profitability) instead of BtoC, BtoB, etc! PtoE will prevail price to sales ratios! You must lower your “burn rate” to raise at least 3-6 months more of funding via cost reductions, even if it means selective staff reductions and reduced marketing and G&A expenses. This is the equivalent to ‘raising
an internal round” through cost reductions to buy you more time until you need to raise money again; hopefully when fund raising is more feasible.

2) If you have $10M or less in the bank you must do #1 above plus look at M&A options for your company; especially if your company is BtoC, content, advertising model, community, commerce, and even BtoB. An M&A transaction will allow you to gain critical mass and to get two sets of funding sources and rolodexes working on your behalf. M&A transactions take over 90 days so you need at least that much cash to fund your company. You must attend our M&A day on May 24th at the San Mateo Marriott at 3:00 PM. We will have investment banks there in addition to entrepreneurs who have
successfully accomplished M&A transactions. We will send you details.

We are still developing many new funding sources for our portfolio companies that are in funding cycle.


Sequoia Memo: (via Slyce of Carnet and others)

Today, Sequoia Capital hosted a mandatory CEO  All-Hands Meeting on Sand Hill Road (where else?). There were about 100 CEO’s in  attendance and let me tell you, the mood was somber. I’m not one to perpetuate  doom and gloom or bad news, but let me underscore this for you: We are in a  serious economic downturn and this is just the beginning. Immediate, decisive  and swift action is required, along with frugal, day-to-day management of  expenses and our business is required.

Speakers:
Mike Moritz, General Partner, Sequoia Capital (he moderated the speakers).

Eric Upin, Partner, Sequoia Capital (Eric ran the $26-Billion Stanford Endowment Fund and knows a few things about Economics and investing.)

Michael Beckwith, Partner, Sequoia Capital (Michael was recruited to start Sequoia’s very first hedge fund, coming from Maverick Capital and Robertson Stephens. I know him from my BEA days.)

Doug Leone, General Partner, Sequoia Capital

Slide  projected on the huge conference room screen as people assembled inside the  conference center to take their seats: a gravestone with the inscription:  RIP, Good Times.


Mike  Moritz:

· The only time  Sequoia’s assembled all CEO’s like this was during the dot.com  crash.
· We are in drastic times. Drastic times  mean drastic measures must be taken to survive. Forget about getting ahead,  we’re talking survive. Get this point into your heads.
· For those of you that are not cash-flow positive, get there  now. Raising capital is nearly impossible if you’re too far off of cash flow  positive.
· There will be  consequences for those who hesitate. Act now.

Eric Upin:

· It’s always darkest before it’s pitch black.
· Survival of this storm means drastic measures must be taken now, so you  will have the opportunity to capitalize on this down turn in the  future.
· We are in the beginning of a long  cycle, what we call a “Secular Bear Market.” This could be a 15 year problem.  [many slides on historical charts of previous recessions, averaging 17 year  cycles.]
· The credit market [versus the Equity  markets] are the issue and will take time to recover.
· Inflection point: Make changes, slash expenses, cut deep and  keep marching. You can’t be a general if you turn back.
· This is a global issue and not a ‘normal’  time.
· There is significant risk to growth and  your personal wealth.
· Advice:

o Manage what you  can control. You can’t control the economy, but you can control everything  else.

§ Cut spending.  Cut fat. Preserve Capital.
§ Don’t trust your  models and spreadsheets. All assumptions prior to today are  wrong.
§ Focus on  quality.
§ Reduce  risk.

Michael  Beckwith:

· Note: Michael  had a lot of slides that were charts, data points and  comparisons.
· A “V” shaped  recovery is unlikely []
· Cuts in spending will accelerate in  Q4/Q1. Look at eBaythis is just the beginning.

Doug Leone:

· This is a different animal and will take years to  recover.
· Getting another round if you’re not  profitable will be rough.
· Do everything  possible to get to cash flow positive. Now.
· Nail your Sales and Marketing message.
· Pound your competitors shortcomings. They’re hurting and they will be  quiet. Take the offensive.
· In a downturn,  aggressive PR and Communications strategy is key.
· M&A will decrease dramatically and only lean companies, with proven  sales models will be acquired.
· Spectrum discussion:

o Capital Preservation ß----------------------------------à Grab  Market
o Everyone should  be far to the left (capital preservation)

· Requirements of our companies:
o You must have a proven product
o You must cut expenses. Now and deep.
o Your product should reduce expenses and drive  revenue
o Honestly assess your solution vs. your competitors.
o Cash is king [have  you gotten this message yet?]
o You must get to profitability as soon as possible to weather this storm  and be self-sustaining.

· Operations review:

o Engineering:  Since you already have a product, strongly consider reducing the number of  engineers that you have.
o Product: What features are  absolutely essential? Choose carefully and focus.
o Marketing: Measure everything and  cut what is not working. You don’t need large Product Marketing, Product  Management teams.
o Sales & Business Development:  What is your return on this investment? The Valley has gotten fat with Sales  people: Big bases, big variables. Cut base salaries on sales people, highly  leverage them with upside (increase variable) and make people pay for themselves  via increased sales productivity. Don’t add sales people until you’ve achieved  your goals with sales productivity. Be disciplined.
o Pipeline: Scrub the shit out of it and be honest with  yourself.
o Finance: Defer payments, what is essential? Kill cash  burn.

· Death Spiral (Nobody moves fast  enough in times like these, so get going and research  later.)

o The death spiral  sucks you in, you’re in it before you know it and then you die.
o Survival of the quickest.
o Cutting deeper is the formula for  survival.
o You should have  at least one year’s worth of cash on hand.
o Tactics:

§ Assess your situation. Drop your assumptions, start with a blank page and  start zero-based budgeting.
§ Adapt  quickly
§ Make your  cuts
§ Review all salaries
§ Change sales comp
§ Bolster your balance sheetif you can add $5M to your coffers, take it and save  it.
§ Spend like it’s your last  dollar.

· Get Real or Go Home.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

What Should Entrepreneurs Look For in Company Counsel?

faqfriday
During a talk today with Dave Felman at UF's Law School (Professor Danny Sokol's class), a student asked what I look for in venture capital counsel.  It was a good question, and the answer for me is similar to what I'd recommend for entrepreneurs vetting company counsel.
dave felman
Although good lawyers come in many packages, there are really four main things I look for:

1) Experience doing venture capital deals: There is no substitute for firms who have done venture captial deals before.  Don't let them spin "corporate law" into "venture or startup law" because the issues involved can be quite different -- not to mention entrepreneurs are unique customers that take getting used to.

2) Business-minded, not legal theory: The best venture lawyers operate like business partners, not lawyers.  They identify and highlight risk, but they know when to trade-off corner-case risk for getting a deal done.  The best I've used lay out what can happen and how likely it is to happen, and put it into context against other deal points being negotiated.  Counsel that argues small, corner-case points will cost you more money and possibly cost you closing a deal -- with little ultimate risk-reduction upside.

3) Experience on both sides of the table: This isn't critical, but I like counsel who have done company-side work and fund-side work.  It brings an understanding and an ability to communicate to the other side why particular points are important.

4) Overall style/persuasiveness: This relates to being business-minded, but the best lawyers speak in terms of partnering and win-win; rather than creating conflict by digging their heels in.  The win-win lawyer can still be tough on the important points, but the tone of discussion makes a big difference.

Labels: , , , ,

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Burnham Institute

medtechthursday
Guest Post by:
Mike Schmitt, MD
Life Science Analyst and Editor of the Florida BioDatabase
Mike can be reached at M2Schmitt@aol.com

As a follow up to last week’s post (Neurodegenerative Disease Treatment) I wanted to mention that the meeting gave me a chance to meet some of the Florida Burnham staff and get acquainted with the Institute’s activities in Central Florida.

One of the first people that I met at the conference was Greg Roth, Ph.D., director of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacology.  If Greg is any indication of the Burnham staff, then the Institute is off to an excellent start.  Greg is bright and outgoing and makes you feel instantly at ease.  It also turned out that we had some “geography” in common as we both have connections to western upstate New York.

For those of you not familiar with the Burnham Institute for Medical Research (www.burnham.org), it is a world class research center originally based out of La Jolla, California with over 600 scientists on staff on the west coast. (Yes, this is where the Scripps Institute is from as well…Florida is finally being discovered as a destination for activities other than Disney, fishing and swimming with the dolphins.)

Burnham is one of the top 10 research centers in receiving grant funding (ranked #4 in 2006) and was recently awarded a $97.9 M NIH grant to expand their Small-Molecule Screening and Discovery Center.

The Institute is committed to both basic science as well as translational research—which brings the results of scientific work done in the laboratory to be used to develop new ways to diagnose and treat a variety of diseases.

They are currently located in a temporary 14,000 square foot space in southwest Orlando, but plan to open a 175,000 square foot facility in mid-2009 in the Orlando Lake Nona medical research campus (located between the Orlando International Airport and the University of Central Florida in southeast Orlando). They are a key part of the expansion of the Florida life science industry as they will ultimately employ over 300 people in our State to be involved in various aspects of cutting edge biomedical research.

Some of this excitement is evident as the Burnham website (www.burnham.org) contains the following quote, “Prior to Burnham’s commitment, we had five or six inquiries from biomedical companies,” says John Fremstad, Vice President of Technology Development for the Metro Orlando Economic Development Commission (EDC). “We’ve had more than 100 since.”

For interested Gator fans, I also hear that UF will be doing a collaborative partnership with Burnham and hopes to have a presence on the Lake Nona campus.

It’s great to see that the State of Florida is continuing to establish its “life science” brand!

Labels: , , ,

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend